In a society characterized by freedom of contract, restrictions on entry to or exit from marriage, or the content of its legal obligations, appear to be an illiberal anomaly. Marriage is between one man and one woman because this is the unit able to procreate without third-party assistance; permanence is required to give children a lifelong family.
A major theme in feminist political philosophy has been the exclusion of the marital family from justice. These theories have implications for the moral status of extra-marital sex and divorce, as well as the point and purpose of marriage. Beyer, Jason A. Share Share.
Some arguments against same-sex marriage invoke a precautionary principle urging that changes which might affect child welfare be made with extreme caution.
Countries like the Netherlands, Colombia, and other countries that legalize same sex marriage. Report this Argument Pro giuliaalivia forfeited this round. For instance, the RH bill languished in Congress for decades despite its broad popularity, while controversial measures like the death penalty bill were easily railroaded by the House of Representatives.
So the barrier to marriage equality posed by the Catholic Church is a convenient exaggeration. Marriage has also been seen as a religious and traditional ceremony in which a man and a woman legally bind themselves to each other for the purpose of procreation, to raise a family together. We have heard of Sodom and Gomorrah, the place consumed and destroyed by God with fire because of gay promiscuity that was described as wicked.
Unfortunately, for many Filipinos civic participation is limited to voting and paying taxes—necessary duties, of course, but only the starting point to democratic change. Same-sex couples should not have same sex marriage debate pros and cons philippines typhoon in Oxford privilege to marry because they cannot breed, which is the main goal of marriage.
One line of response has been to suggest that marriage involves a promise not to feel but to behave a certain way—to act in ways likely to sustain the relationship. As noted above, such rationales come into tension with liberal neutrality; further controversy regarding them same sex marriage debate pros and cons philippines typhoon in Oxford be discussed below 5.
A more sweeping view, to be discussed in Section 5, is that marriage is in itself oppressive and unjust, and hence ought to be abolished CardFinemanChambers Not only is less attention paid to promoting those goods legally and discouraging behavior contrary to thembut the moral principle forbidding action contrary to basic human goods is not consistently applied elsewhere—for example, to eating unhealthily Garrett The gay community has created its own vibrant culture.
Goldstein, Joshua D. Crucially, however, there is also an important benefit of legal, and indirectly social, recognition of a relationship as marriage.
This approach, in the work of different philosophers, yields a variety of specific prescriptions, on, for example, whether marital love or committed romantic love in general requires sexual difference or sexual exclusivity Scruton , —, Chapter 11, Halwani , —, Chartier Third, appeal to an existing definition in the context of debate over what the law of marriage, or its moral obligations, should be risks begging the question: in debate over same-sex marriage, for example, appeal to the current legal definition begs the normative question of what the law should be.
Recall that some arguments for same-sex marriage claim that central, exclusive relationships are valuable, and that same-sex marriage would benefit gays and lesbians by encouraging them to enter such relationships e. Second, claims about the value of sexual self-control are controversial; objectors might argue that polygamy, polyamory, or promiscuity are equally good options see 5.
To a certain extent, the point that actual legal or social definitions cannot settle the question of what features marriage should have is just. Comment on this column at chicagotribune.